Looks like Charlie has changed his mindagain on the "911 was an inside job thing"... again.
Charlie now states that it WAS an inside job, but not one that involved the government putting explosives into the WTC buildings.
Back in late june 2011 Charlie shocked the conspiracy world by announcing that he no longer had any emotional attachment to 911 Conspioracy theories (See below clip)
After years of of campaigning for "The Truth" to come out regarding the attack of the WTC buildings, including organising an event with Richard Gageof Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Charlie shocked the conspiracy world by stating that the collapse of the twin towers and building 7, as well as the attack on the Pentagon, all had perfectly rational, scientific explanations to their violent destructions.
What followed was a very public breakup with his GF Silkie, and a sustained torrent of hate as the Conspiracy World turned on one of their own. Suddenly, one of the 9/11's coolest activists had become Satan incarnate.
Check out Max Igan vs Charlie in the below clip
as well as Charlie vs Luke Rudkowski (Is charlie smoking a joint?)
Does charlie have a right to express his opinion? Sure. But as Charlie has discovered, doing such a dramatic U-Turn on the community that regarded him as an icon can have dire consequences. The "9/11 was an Inside Job" crowd are a very passionate bunch, and if you are a perceived leader in the movement you better have you shit straightened out before you make public announcements.
For all intents and purposes I like Charlie and I support his search for "Truth" in his own way. As someone who has been waking up in such a public way his journey has been fascinating to watch... he's come a long way from bull horning the public and the police on the streets. It's easy for the "Awake" to spread the hate... but isn't that what we're fighting against?
Above is an old debate featuring Wolf Blitzer and Dr Norman Finkelstein, the latter the star of the excellent documentary "American Radical". Poor old Wolf has been copping it very unsweet recently, with his highly unorthodox behaviour as a "Journalist" now being questioned.
The Wolfman's show is at the centre of some very dodgy and highly biased treatment claims against a certain Dr. RON PAUL, and we here at CC, with the help of Youtube, thought it might be interesting to point out some pants pounding highlights of the Wolfman in action.
In case you missed it, Wolfman screened a heavily redacted (some would say highly dishonest) interview conducted by CNN's Gloria Borger ... ,
Here's the unedited version ...
Of course, whilst other news shows outside of FOX may have felt a twinge of embarrassment, it didn't stop the Wolfman himself following up with this outstanding example of journalistic integrity and honesty ...
Well, it takes guts to insult the intelligence of the general public again, and again, and again, eh Wolf?
Keep them rolling Wolf ... I especially like how you treated this American Soldier below ...
* UPDATE
Looks like CNN is at it again. This time with Dana Bash (born Dana Ruth Schwartz; June 15, 1971). The reporter who was interviewing the American soldier above before it ended with "technical difficulties", has now been targeted for alleged BIAS, with a Ron Paul Super PAC wanting CNN to punch her ticket out from covering the campaign. Regardless, CNN is once again at the centre of biased media claims.